Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Six\-position\s+coax\s+switches\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Six\-position\s+coax\s+switches\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Six-position coax switches (score: 1): Author: RHealy@mdsroc.com (Healy, Rus); Date: Mon Nov 10 11:49:29 1997; What are y'all using for six-position (manually operated, in-the-shack variety) coax switches? I'm looking for a reasonable mix of economy and performance (isolation and return loss). two- and four-p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00250.html (7,748 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Six-position coax switches (score: 1): Author: kw4t@erols.com (Dan Weisenburger); Date: Mon Nov 10 23:30:20 1997; I have tried all of the referenced switches. The B/W, although feeling light-weight seems to have the best reliability as I've been using the same switch with 6 positions for 15 years. It has been st; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00264.html (7,909 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Six-position coax switches (score: 1): Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt Trott--K7BG); Date: Mon Nov 10 19:05:21 1997; Ordered 2 of these recently as I had an old one that worked FB. One of the 2 I ordered was intermittent. Opened it up and was not impressed. Bent the copper strips around a little and it worked for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00270.html (7,089 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]