Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmer\s+and\s+M\/2\,\s+M\/M\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmer\s+and\s+M\/2\,\s+M\/M\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer and M/2, M/M (score: 1): Author: "Hal Kennedy" <halken@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:48:19 -0500; The discussion has been centered on single op so far and on finding mults - but there are tremendous potential ramifications for M/2 and M/M as well as run frequency assistance in single op - and thi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00333.html (8,479 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer and M/2, M/M (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:08:36 -0400; Good catch, Hal. Two things occur: In order for a Skimmer telnet host to be legal by this definition, its IP address would have to be *widely* publicized - otherwise it is not public in the same sens; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00338.html (8,698 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer and M/2, M/M (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:28:12 -0500; Gosh Hal, should I be embarrassed to be your teammate? Such a diabolical mind! It seems like this sort of thing you suggest is unsportsmanlike and should not be allowed by the rules. It's a well unde; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00345.html (11,217 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer and M/2, M/M (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:43:09 +0000; nope, my wintelnetx could still take that local connect and make it public, or feed it to a cluster, or whatever. The purpose of such a receiver, if advertised, is obvious and would undoubtedly be c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00357.html (11,153 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]