Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmer\s+in\s+WAE\s+CW\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmer\s+in\s+WAE\s+CW\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer in WAE CW? (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:13:24 -0400; Since the WAE rules make no distinction between single op and single op assisted/unlimited, I'm curious how many stations will be using CW Skimmer this weekend, in lieu of or in addition to packet. I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00063.html (7,546 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer in WAE CW? (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 01:34:12 +0200; I tested Skimmer in EUHFC and intend to use it again in WAE mainly above 7030 kHz :-) Mine is 455 kHz IF SDR similar to DH1TW design but covering both FT-1000MP RX. Considering only 20 kHz passband a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00073.html (7,000 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer in WAE CW? (score: 1): Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>; Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:37:52 +0200; WAE rules has been changed. You now can use up to 7040. Still a violation of what was agreed in Region 1, (during large international contest only contest-free segments are 10, 18 and 24 MHZ ) but it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00074.html (8,258 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer in WAE CW? (score: 1): Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:09:40 -0400; Also, the log deadline is now two weeks after the end of the contest. That is a rather significant change! 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00080.html (9,390 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]