Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmers\s+and\s+Rules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmers\s+and\s+Rules\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Skimmers and Rules (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 06:51:01 -0400; The big problem I can see for contest sponsors is that the statistical methods recently explained here, by which packet cheaters can be identified, will not work with Skimmer. A log produced using SO; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00547.html (7,693 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmers and Rules (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:30:14 +0100; Maybe we should be talking about an entirely new class structure for single-ops -- something like "Advanced" and "Traditional". Or maybe three levels - "Traditional", "Advanced" and "Unlimited". Cons; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00620.html (7,346 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmers and Rules (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:05:35 -0500; This is interesting. I was playing catch up, reading through the messages queued since last night. I was about to suggest a new contest be created to test and exploit the CW Skimmer technology. It wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00634.html (10,093 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmers and Rules (score: 1): Author: "Colleen Brakob" <cbrakob@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:12:03 -0600; three I second the motion. I have no objection to "skimmers" competing with "skimmers", but I object to "skimmers" competing with "radiomen". 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 "Just a boy and his radios" _______; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00640.html (7,969 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]