Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Some\s+Contest\-Rule\s+Topics\s*$/: 63 ]

Total 63 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: n6aa@juno.com (Richard J Norton)
Date: Mon Jul 14 16:20:37 1997
I would be interested in seeing opinions from this group posted here regarding contesting in general for the following: 1) Should QRP and/or low-power category entrants call stations using high-power
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00148.html (8,178 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: kal.atlanta@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson)
Date: Tue Jul 15 00:57:41 1997
n6aa@juno.com (Richard J Norton) brough up some interesting points (you must be back in the states if you're using juno). No, QRP and low power should start and end the contest as they started. Any t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00156.html (10,166 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: w2ce@juno.com (w2ce@juno.com)
Date: Mon Jul 14 20:59:02 1997
Unfortunately we seem to be at a stage of stretching the rules of contests as far as they will go. Forgotten is the intentions of the sponsors. Power levels/classes are what they are. It doesn't say
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00162.html (9,817 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: nd3a@worldnet.att.net (Robert Shapiro)
Date: Mon Jul 14 20:59:58 1997
Hi Dick. A definite NO to question one and re question two, there should be a rule against it. For question three, I would say that contacts on other bands should still be allowed per check log rule,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00163.html (10,595 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton)
Date: Mon Jul 14 20:30:59 1997
I would be interested in seeing opinions from this group posted here regarding contesting in general for the following: 1) Should QRP and/or low-power category entrants call stations using high-power
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00164.html (9,633 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: ksiid@access.mountain.net (Tom Horton)
Date: Mon Jul 14 20:30:57 1997
Dick, This should be an interesting thread. Too bad I have to leave for Algeria in the morning and be out of E-Mail capability for the next month. Tom...K5IID 1. ABSOLUTELY NOT !!!!!!!!!!!!! Actuall
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00165.html (10,795 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: jayt@comtch.iea.com (Jay Townsend)
Date: Mon Jul 14 16:56:56 1997
If a QRP uses high-power for any purpose then it should be reclassified as high power. The analogy would be using 1500 watts to break the pile-up for a mult and then work it with 150 watts. No. As to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00167.html (9,641 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: n6ig@netcom.com (Jim Pratt)
Date: Mon Jul 14 16:46:21 1997
Of course they should call high power stations! As much as I mumble and grumble about "those darn QRP stations" when they call me in a contest, forcing me to pull them out of the noise, they represen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00168.html (8,801 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: bogus@does.not.exist.com (bogus@does.not.exist.com)
Date: Tue Jul 15 13:57:38 1997
No. Similarily They should be not be allowed to have a QRO or semi-QRO friend or accomplice call a station and then ask that station to "listen for" the lesser powered station. This happens to me reg
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00174.html (10,334 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy W. Cox)
Date: Tue Jul 15 10:04:37 1997
No Yes (sadly) No Should they ? NO ... Do they ? "probably" as that's why they are out 'trolling' the other bands .... rules NOW don't say they can't ... Yes ... (again sadly) It is a SAD reflection
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00177.html (10,336 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: hansbrakob@juno.com (Hans Brakob)
Date: Tue Jul 15 10:02:48 1997
No. In my opinion (obligatory disclaimer) the rules are already "against it". If you use something other than QRP, even for one contact, or part of a contact, then your entry is not QRP. No. Again,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00178.html (9,704 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver)
Date: Tue Jul 15 08:00:47 1997
This should not be allowed. Why not call CQ at High-Power and then make the QSO at Low-Power? The rule should state that "All contacts counted towards the final score shall be solicited and complete
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00179.html (10,081 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: paul1@wizard.ucs.sfu.ca (Paul Erickson)
Date: Tue Jul 15 06:56:13 1997
Hi Dick, IMHO, the answer to 1 is definately NO. I run in the qrp catagory usually and would find such a practice offensive. I find it sad that there seems to be the need for a rule, but if the pract
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00180.html (10,680 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR)
Date: Wed Jul 16 19:46:20 1997
By definition, if a station uses high-power, he can't possibly be a QRP or low-power category entrant. The question is nonsensical. Rule against what? I've heard of it being done. At issue here would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00187.html (10,173 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: broz@csn.net (John Brosnahan)
Date: Wed Jul 16 08:47:27 1997
Dick, ABSOLUTELY NOT--Totally against the concept of QRP operation and violates the spirit of contest competition. I don't see much difference between calling stations with high power and then reduci
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00193.html (13,361 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Tue Jul 15 22:32:20 1997
Seems to me that this question, and the others stated in the original message, revolves around whether or not it is OK to weasel around the spirit of the intended rules. To me, the answer is no. To m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00195.html (10,593 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: broz@csn.net (John Brosnahan)
Date: Thu Jul 17 12:28:04 1997
(Sorry about the formatting on my original post to the reflector on this subject--I guess the reflector adds its own formatting if the lines are too long. Made it a little less presentable but the id
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00198.html (10,395 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten)
Date: Fri Jul 18 18:03:23 1997
On Tue, 15 Jul 1997 09:02:48 -0500 hansbrakob@juno.com (Hans Brakob) writes: [A discussion of QRP rules in CQ WW, followed by:] K1VR replies: Former Red Sox pitcher Bill "Spaceman" Lee was once asked
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00207.html (9,426 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: kw4t@erols.com (Dan Weisenburger)
Date: Tue Jul 22 09:53:16 1997
Hi Group, I'll try to be brief: I tip my hat to those who can influence a multiplier to move to another band but I think it should be limited to "multi-operator" stations and "all-banders". I feel it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00245.html (9,886 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1)
Author: kw4t@erols.com (Dan Weisenburger)
Date: Tue Jul 22 09:53:16 1997
Hi Group, I'll try to be brief: I tip my hat to those who can influence a multiplier to move to another band but I think it should be limited to "multi-operator" stations and "all-banders". I feel it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00246.html (9,586 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu