- 1. [CQ-Contest] Speedy CWers (score: 1)
- Author: fk@diolog.de (Fabian Kurz)
- Date: Fri May 18 12:49:39 2001
- There is certainly a limit, but i don't know where it might be ... I guess at ca. 150 QSO ... but one thing is for sure: the score and QSO-increasement gets slower and slower with the time... My best
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00203.html (7,617 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Speedy CWers (score: 1)
- Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner)
- Date: Fri May 18 13:17:06 2001
- I found the same problem when setting the speed in the 70-80 WPM range. My brain just stops working after a while. Going slower (60-66 WPM) gives me much steadier runs till the end, and most importan
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00205.html (8,787 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Speedy CWers (score: 1)
- Author: w4au@contesting.com (John Unger)
- Date: Fri May 18 15:01:24 2001
- Or maybe it would be even faster if PED could be set up to emulate TRLog... 73 - John, W4AU -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00206.html (8,340 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Speedy CWers (score: 1)
- Author: lw9euj@ciudad.com.ar (CYBERGURUES)
- Date: Sat Jun 16 23:39:05 2001
- Hi: A couple weeks ago some guys were "horrified" by the 110 Qs/10 mins, achieved by the top entrants in the single caller class of the BCC Pile up competition. Now the top three surpassed the 115, a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00003.html (9,759 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu