Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Split\s+operation\s+in\s+contests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Split\s+operation\s+in\s+contests\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Split operation in contests (score: 1): Author: "Tony Rogozinski" <trogo@telegraphy.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:58:09 -0400; If I can maximize my rate and also give many more people a QSO from a rare multiplier (been there and done that many times) who is to say that listening off my transmit frequency isnt good operating; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00348.html (7,946 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in contests (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:52:05 -0500; Tony I agree with you on what your saying, I do the same thing when I have 5 or 6 guys calling. I think that the CQWW powers want to do is keep somone from calling for up 2 or whatever. Rex K7QQ ____; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00355.html (9,650 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]