Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Split\s+operation\s+with\s+JA\s+on\s+80m\s+RTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Split\s+operation\s+with\s+JA\s+on\s+80m\s+RTTY\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Split operation with JA on 80m RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Hide JH8KYU" <jh8kyu@qsl.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 05:37:32 +0900; I posted JA RTTY sub-bands a few days ago. Someone in the US asked me if it's realistic to operate split for JA on 80m. Yes, I think it's one of realistic ideas. But not so many JA's and W's seem to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00218.html (6,730 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation with JA on 80m RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Rick Lindquist, WW1ME" <ww1me@roadrunner.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 18:41:11 -0500; Useful info, Hide. Thanks, although I don't envision being lucky enough to even hear JA on 80 from Maine. Just a reminder: US stations may operate RTTY in the 3520-3530 kHz segment, although you may; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00221.html (8,163 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]