There are two problems with abuses of spotting information: 1) Using spotting network information when the category of submission prohibits it - this is cheating. 2) Using the spotting network infor
Sure, it could be added to N1MM (although, when you think it through, it's not so "simple"), but the scenario would look like this: Within moments of a "G4" spot showing up, some do-gooder will spot
OF COURSE they want the full call. So what? They would have to listen for 10 seconds and not barge in and out like an over-sugared two-year-old? When I'm operating at a multi-multi where the level o
I want to be sure to point out that I think the sponsors of the major contests do, with few exceptions, a very fine job of administering and adjudicating those contest programs. They do so with a pa
Spotting prefix only will break the spotting network filters and log program filters that sort the bandmaps. Since every dj1 would look the same the logging programs would only keep the latest one, a
Ward, you almost made me spit my coffee out OM! :-) Does anybody remember a skill called IDENTIFYING STATIONS? It works like this. We TUNE the band, and when we hear a signal, we try to IDENTIFY IT.