Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+State\s+QSO\s+parties\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+State\s+QSO\s+parties\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] State QSO parties (score: 1): Author: drkstar7@gte.net (Mark); Date: Wed Jul 15 04:29:59 1998; With regard to the combining of state QSO parties - I think it is a good idea in some cases. For instance, I think that the entire Northwest Division should probably have their respective states' QSO; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00358.html (8,107 bytes)
22. [CQ-Contest] State QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:33:44 -0500; The VT, MN, and DE, State QSO parties, are this weekend. All three have the same exchange for "non" VT, MN, and DE stations. I think all State QSO parties, especially those that fall on weekends with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00039.html (6,861 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 22
Page: [1] [2]