Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Station\s+not\s+giving\s+a\s+check\s+or\s+section\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: I H <ih772@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:32:24 -0800 (PST)
During SS phone last weekend I heard a KP4 sending only his serial number and precedent. He didn't give a check or section. Will it be counted as a valid qso? If it isn't, I wonder how many will miss
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00307.html (7,405 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:44:20 -0700
How could it count? It was not a valid exchange. Did people just guess at the check? During SS phone last weekend I heard a KP4 sending only his serial number and precedent. He didn't give a check or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00312.html (8,496 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "Felipe J Hernandez" <fhdez@islandnetjm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:08:10 -0400
THere where only 2 or 3 kp4's active. I was one of them, I suspect that maybe trying to save time he cut it short, the piles were so crazy that we had to work split in order not to be covered by the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00332.html (9,110 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:12:03 +0000 (GMT)
I know at least one QRPer who was THRILLED to happen across the frequency when this happened. Thanks Felipe! de Doug KR2Q _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00347.html (7,471 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "Professional Home Inspections" <Paul@ProHomeInspector.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:44:45 -0500
I am sure the log checking software does not take into account "good intentions" Other rare sections stations didn't need to work split when the piles were so crazy in order to not be covered by the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00394.html (10,618 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "Felipe J Hernandez" <fhdez@islandnetjm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:32:43 -0400
Maybe someone else can confirm that indeed he wasnt giving the whole exchange. Im sure that opinions from people that really listened to him would be more meaningful than mine. Felipe NP4Z -- Origina
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00415.html (11,405 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Tavan N6XI" <rtavan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:58:50 -0800
The station in question often gave out partial exchanges. He didn't utter the phrase "Puerto Rico" on every QSO but he did say it while I was listening. He also gave out two years a couple times whil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00446.html (13,755 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "Felipe J Hernandez" <fhdez@islandnetjm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:14:55 -0400
Thanks Rick.... Fair response. Cu on WWCW! Felipe NP4Z The station in question often gave out partial exchanges. He didn't utter the phrase "Puerto Rico" on every QSO but he did say it while I was li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00449.html (14,067 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:39:33 -0800
Probably not. I've read somewhere (probably here) that the log checking software is able to detect "unstable station" exchange information, and does not throw the contact out. 73, de Hans, K0HB _____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00451.html (9,075 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "Felipe J Hernandez" <fhdez@islandnetjm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:59:22 -0400
Hans, Thanks for the politically correct explanation.. I guess you mean a "Loco operator"? IM sure Ill be joining that list on sunday after not sleeping for a few days.. It is a toughtful solution fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00458.html (10,773 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:33:09 -0800
Nothing "politically correct" about it, Felipe. The "unstable" refers to the fact that log robot found information in the exchange from a particular station was not consistent throughout the contest.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00459.html (11,885 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "Felipe J Hernandez" <fhdez@islandnetjm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:15:41 -0400
Yes, I understand ... I was refering more to the term "unstable operator" In dayton weve joked around with the likes of N2NT, K5ZD, W2Gd and many others that in fact theyve had these out of body expe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00461.html (12,495 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Tavan N6XI" <rtavan@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:49:28 -0800
My favorite hallucination was many years ago as N6XI/4X on 80M Sunday night of CQWW CW. The band was dense with stations but I knew it was two dimensional - not just up and down the band but also in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00479.html (10,025 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu