Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Suggestions\s+for\s+RTTY\s+RU\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 17:51:43 -0700
TOO is not a cut number or abbreviation. It's your RTTY decoder missing the SHIFT character prior to sending the report. Don't forget, even though you're typing in ASCII, Baudot is a 5 bit code and t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00031.html (11,890 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:50:59 -0600
I have a suggestion for RTTY RU people this weekend: stay above .060 on all bands. Respectfully submitted for your consideration. Jim Cain At The New (temporary) K1TN Superstation 6 miles east of Mou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00040.html (6,634 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: "Bryon PAUL Veal n0ah" <bryonveal@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:47:33 -0700
James, The RTTY and digital crowd who just banter along all day at various frequencies below .060 justify dumping their signals in the CW windows as progress and as a result of the wonderful FCC band
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00041.html (8,022 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 13:48:49 -0700
Do CW contesters stay below 060? The problems include the number of signals in the contest and on 40m, the different allocations in R1 and R3. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO __________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00042.html (9,530 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:56:49 -0800
Excellent idea as the NAQP CW will also be on this weekend. 73 Tom W7WHY I have a suggestion for RTTY RU people this weekend: stay above .060 on all bands. Respectfully submitted for your considerati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00043.html (7,291 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: rin JG1VGX <jg1vgx@jarl.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:32:01 +0900
FYI, Japanese band plan for RTTY (and psk, jt65 etc): 3520 - 3530 7025 - 7045 14070 - 14112 21070 - 21125 28070 - 28150 Yes, we can go split on the low bands! 73 de rin JG1VGX _______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00048.html (7,260 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 07:14:45 -0700
Now that almost every country in the world can operate 40 meters up to 7200, is there still a good reason why the suggested 40 meter RTTY segment should be so low in the band ? 73, Steve, N2IC ______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00052.html (8,395 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: "Bryon PAUL Veal n0ah" <bryonveal@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 07:57:28 -0700
How long has this JA band plan been in place? Who put it at the top of the "DX Alley" on 80M? Who put it at the edge of "DX Alley" on 40M? If we understood who does this stuff, maybe we can figure ou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00053.html (9,263 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: rin JG1VGX <jg1vgx@jarl.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 23:35:14 +0900
Steve, I found I need to correct the previous post. On low bands, there are some more higher portion shared with other modes where RTTY is allowed. Now correctly the JA RTTY (data) bands are: 3520 -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00057.html (9,526 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: rin JG1VGX <jg1vgx@jarl.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 01:00:12 +0900
Paul, This has been in place since almost two years. Regarding the "who", there should have been a local band plan WG, which I know little about. Looks like we now share 7100 - 7125 and 3599 - 3600 a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00059.html (10,215 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:48:37 -0600
Just look at the 80 & 40 meter bands (not band plans, the allowable bands) around the world and see what they have to work with. Japan has only 300KHz or so on 80 meters, so everything shifts down. A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00060.html (10,738 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu