Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Survey\s+Results\:\s+Does\s+Streaming\s+Contest\s+Audio\s+Violate\s+Contest\s+Ethics\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Survey\s+Results\:\s+Does\s+Streaming\s+Contest\s+Audio\s+Violate\s+Contest\s+Ethics\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Survey Results: Does Streaming Contest Audio Violate Contest Ethics? (score: 1): Author: jpescatore@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:57:12 -0500 (EST); Just over 100 contesters responded to the survey back in December: 50% said streaming contest audio doesn't violate common contest ethics 33% said it does In the long form answers, most felt if some; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00141.html (7,636 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Survey Results: Does Streaming Contest Audio Violate Contest Ethics? (score: 1): Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:13:32 -0700; Exactly how would one cheat by listening to this? I am glad to see that most people have figured out if you have time to be listening to another stations feed you are losing. I see no reason to burde; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00146.html (8,580 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]