Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sweepstakes\s+Legends\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sweepstakes\s+Legends\s*$/: 69 ]

Total 69 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (K7BG Matt Trott); Date: Tue Jul 8 14:20:05 1997; I began to ponder the psyche of these operators and I, with some amazement, realized that (at least as far as said article goes) there was no mention of "two radio" operating. I'm quite sure that the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00056.html (9,052 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: geoiii@bga.com (george fremin iii); Date: Tue Jul 8 16:20:13 1997; It was used before computers. You still don't need two radios to win SSB SS. Nope - in fact I think it is still eaiser to check for dupes on a paper dupe sheet than it is with a computer. Good topic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00058.html (8,651 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Tue Jul 8 23:04:05 1997; On CW in the early 1960's they were major competition. Dave W5WZQ (W5UN now) was often the high scorer. On phone (AM even at times) K6EVR and I (K5MDX then)fought it out for several years. There were; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00061.html (12,606 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed Jul 9 02:35:43 1997; Come on George. Your not really serious are you? With all the prefix's there are now? I can remember the dupe sheets I used to have for the contests, and I had to make them out of butcher paper to h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00062.html (9,172 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: n7tr@rnodx.org (Richard Hallman); Date: Tue Jul 8 19:43:53 1997; Still using ONE radio here.....Not sure what I would do if I needed to listen on another radio during SS Phone.... I know SS CW is a different story.... See ya! Rich N7TR Reno I began to ponder the p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00063.html (10,806 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (K7BG Matt Trott); Date: Tue Jul 8 17:24:37 1997; I'm leaving for vacation for 10 days or so. I will try to write a summary of this topic when I return if need be. Feel free to post your reply, if any, to the reflector if I may be so bold. 73, Matt-; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00064.html (8,289 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (David O Hachadorian); Date: Tue Jul 8 18:45:56 1997; By the time you get two 75A4's, two HT-32B's, and a couple of 1960 - style KW's on the desk, you'd be lucky if it didn't collapse! Not many folks could afford two rigs back then. Even if you could af; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00066.html (10,858 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough); Date: Tue Jul 8 21:41:24 1997; Come on George. Your not really serious are you? With all the prefix's there are now? I don't know that I would agree with K5TR that it's *easier* to dupe with a paper dupe sheet in the Sweepstakes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00067.html (11,102 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes Legends (score: 1): Author: al511@freenet.uchsc.edu (Robert Neece); Date: Wed Jul 9 14:34:05 1997; As I recall, the first full-capability two-radio efforts that gained wide-spread recognition in SS were done by WB6OLD in the early-to-mid 1970's from the QTH of Ted Gillette, W6HX. Ted's station was; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00070.html (9,457 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: n0ss@sockets.net (Tom Hammond); Date: Wed Jul 9 12:34:24 1997; How about having the call entry routine perform a real-time dupe check AS the call is being entered.. say starting after the first four characters have been entered... this would eliminate (at least; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00071.html (9,244 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: cooper@gmpvt.com (Tom Cooper); Date: Wed Jul 9 11:53:55 1997; As I remember it, with a separate transmitter, vfo and receiver, I had my hands full keeping the transmitter tuned (tubes), zerobeating the VFO and dealing with receiver overload. The computer elimin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00073.html (8,834 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup); Date: Wed Jul 9 09:29:58 1997; These are just my two cents: Probably (1) or (2). If no one was using two radios, then no one would need two radios, as they were on an even playing field with all the competition in at least this r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00075.html (10,392 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: w2up@itw.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Wed Jul 9 18:31:13 1997; If you keep the check-partial window open, it does this. 73 Barry -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@itw.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club - -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00077.html (9,270 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Wed Jul 9 18:39:30 1997; I'm not sure that I qualify as an SS legend, but I did make top ten several times and won CW once. I was also part of the K5LZO multi-op that dominated SS in the late 60's and early 70's. 'LZO and I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00078.html (12,007 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: leith@inhb.co.nz (Leith Jennings); Date: Thu Jul 10 12:59:06 1997; Hi all The thing that I remember about the sweepstakes contests when I lived in Canada in the early 50's was that most stations were separate TX and RX with a push button on the TX for VFO spotting.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00082.html (12,522 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: aalaun@ibm.net (Fred Laun K3ZO); Date: Wed Jul 9 23:33:25 1997; 70's. Far from using two radios, Vic, W4KFC, even changed plug-in tank coils in his military-surplus BC-610 (which was his only amplifier) every time he changed bands! 73, Fred - -- CQ-Contest on WWW; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00084.html (9,387 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: n4xm@iglou.com (Paul D. Schrader); Date: Wed Jul 9 18:30:50 1997; I am 100% convinced manual logging is faster (more contacts) than computer logging. You have to have the right system. It is also more tiring. Been there, done that. Been contesting 40 years. Ex: W4B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00085.html (9,811 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes Legends (score: 1): Author: bogus@does.not.exist.com (bogus@does.not.exist.com); Date: Thu Jul 10 16:07:40 1997; << As I recall, the first full-capability two-radio efforts that gained wide-spread recognition in SS were done by WB6OLD in the early-to-mid 1970's from the QTH of Ted Gillette, W6HX. How did this g; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00086.html (13,682 bytes)
19. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: gdo@aloft.micro.lucent.com (Glenn D. O'Donnell); Date: Thu Jul 10 10:02:21 1997; I disagree Tom. In my eyes, and in the eyes of MANY, you ARE a legend! I think call recognition has some effect but certainly not as much as the other factors you noted. The recognition factor is wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00090.html (10,725 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: bogus@does.not.exist.com (bogus@does.not.exist.com); Date: Thu Jul 10 09:09:47 1997; in La Porte, IN while going to a school in Chicago for Xerox or IBM. He took me over to Larry,s, W9IOP, to see his setup. 70' amazement, of radios limiting and There were Bohme keyers and Whetstone; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00091.html (12,719 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]