Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sweepstakes\s+Scoring\s+Rules\s+for\s+Dupes\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sweepstakes\s+Scoring\s+Rules\s+for\s+Dupes\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes Scoring Rules for Dupes? (score: 1): Author: Bill N6MW <billsstuffn6mw@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:40:43 -0700; The question is how are dupes in the SS treated in log checking. Aside from the conventional wisdom of not removing your dupes since there is no penalty, there remains some mystery. Assume have a dup; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-07/msg00092.html (7,240 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes Scoring Rules for Dupes? (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 21:32:15 -0300; Bill, I don?t often play in SS (the reason is outside the scope of this reply) and every contest is different?99.9% of them say to log all dupes. I just looked over the SS rules and don?t see anythin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-07/msg00093.html (8,449 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes Scoring Rules for Dupes? (score: 1): Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 06:48:49 -0400; I am not involved in log checking, but the answer seems clear in the SS rules themselves. A QSO with a miscopied exchange is* removed* from the log without penalty. So if there is a dupe with the cor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-07/msg00094.html (9,901 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes Scoring Rules for Dupes? (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:29:31 -0700; I'm a long time member of NCCC, a very large contest club. One of the first things we're taught is to always work dupes and never to remove them from a log. 73, Jim K9YC _____________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-07/msg00099.html (8,535 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]