Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+T1MC\s+vs\s+TM1C\s+$ethics\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+T1MC\s+vs\s+TM1C\s+$ethics\?$\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?) (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Thu Mar 6 01:44:03 1997; So..... The BIG question is: 1) DID YOU CHANGE THAT CALL IN YOUR LOG TO TM1C, 2) LEAVE IT AS IS (T1MC)? 3) DELETED THE QSO COMPLETED 4) LEFT IT IN, COUNTED IT AS ZERO POINTS. 5) OTHER? de Doug KR2Q@w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00081.html (7,182 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?) (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu Mar 6 12:40:24 1997; OK, I'll stir the pot a little, realizing that this is a hardy perennial and we're not likely to reach a consensus. If I felt pretty sure that it was just dyslexic typing (TM1C was pretty loud, after; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00086.html (7,881 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?) (score: 1): Author: kmahler@visi.net (Kevin S. Mahler); Date: Thu Mar 6 10:41:08 1997; Yes! Considering that I had worked TM1C on other bands AND at the end of the contest I worked him again on 80 and he told me it was a DUPE but I didn't show a dupe. I told him we had worked on other; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00089.html (7,613 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?) (score: 1): Author: martin38945@juno.com (martin38945@juno.com); Date: Thu Mar 6 21:19:16 1997; Now Kevin... don't you dare go to sleep tonight unless you know the answer to this question. After all... this is a question of... gasp... Ethics! And I wouldn't leave those log sheets laying around; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00096.html (8,942 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?) (score: 1): Author: k5zd@ultranet.com (Randy Thompson); Date: Thu Mar 6 21:55:28 1997; In the case of ARRL Contests, the logging police are all at the donut shop. Z Now Kevin... don't you dare go to sleep tonight unless you know the answer to this question. After all... this is a quest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00097.html (7,827 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?) (score: 1): Author: abrogdon@arrl.org (Brogdon, Al, W1AB); Date: Fri Mar 7 09:21:00 1997; _______________ Herr Martin, We in CT have recognized T1 since the Treaty of 1810.5. "Und why?" you might ask. Simple--to get the added multiplier, even if the note IS very bad. Al, 599 CT -- CQ-Con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00100.html (7,270 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]