Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+TB\-wires\s+WPX\s+category\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "Oleg Skydan" <sov1178@rambler.ru>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:03:32 +0300
Hi, All! How many elements the tri-bander can have to match this category? Another question - the multi-element-multi-band quad antennas are very popular in the exUSSR. Usually such antennas use sepa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00040.html (7,587 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 16:19:22 +0100
Hi Oleg, If your quad antenna is have 3 bands 20,15,10 then its tribander Same situation with yagi antennas even if its use separate cable for each band 73 Al 4L5A http://contesting.at-communication.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00043.html (8,584 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:10:46 +0100
Im sorry Oleg I just check rules and its say ONE feedline in point C Im sorry 73 Al 4L5A http://contesting.at-communication.com http://dxing.at-communication.com http://forum.at-communication.com ___
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00050.html (9,414 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:57:55 -0400
Hi Oleg a) Tribander/Single Element (TB-WIRES): During the contest an entrant shall use only one (1) tribander (any type, with a single feed line from the transmitter to the antenna) for 10, 15, and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00052.html (9,979 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri VE3DZ" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:13:05 -0400
This is wrong interpretation. "(a) Tribander/Single Element (TB-WIRES): During the contest an entrant shall use only one (1) tribander (any type, with a single feed line from the transmitter to the a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00053.html (10,080 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:43:51 -0400
I am not thrilled with this Tri-band and wires category. I know some have entered that have a wire beam on 40. Plus why would a single band entry be different from a normal Single Bnad entry? I have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00054.html (8,343 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "Oleg Skydan" <sov1178@rambler.ru>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 21:23:58 +0300
Tom, Alex, Timothy, Ryan, gentlemen, thank you for the discussion... It looks like there are different interpretations of the rule. I am not going to entry in this class (in spite of my station may c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00055.html (8,943 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 06:32:55 -0800
<quote> Is my station eligible for the Tribander/Single-Element category? The purpose of this category is to enable competition by similarly equipped stations, thus the restrictions on the number and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00072.html (11,010 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:10:00 -0500
So a Quad, with a single boom (obviously) all interlaced, that can operate on 20-15-10, but has seperate feedlines does not fit, but if it had a remote coax switch it would? or would it not still sin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00075.html (12,958 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 10:48:59 -0400
As to receive antennas, I'd allow for 1 beverage or for a combination of smaller, compact antennnas (K9AY, pennant, etc). 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest maili
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00077.html (13,008 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:45:09 -0500
Hello Randy, What is the rationale or thought behind the "one feedline" from a tribander (or quad) rule opposed to separate feedlines? I believe some manufacturers offer these choices as an option (F
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00081.html (9,113 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "Oleg Skydan" <sov1178@rambler.ru>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 22:50:27 +0300
Thanks for the clarification, Randy, As far as I understand the 10-15-20 quad antenna should comply with the rules if only one feedline is used from the station to the antenna (to the switching box).
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00082.html (10,637 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 14:49:54 -0600
Hi Randy, Maybe a tribander should be defined as having only one driven element for all 3 bands. OK, back in my hole, Ron, KU7Y SOWP 5545M Caldwell, ID ku7y@qsl.net __________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00084.html (8,634 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 15:49:39 -0400
I will take a stab at it - Multiple feedlines can allow SO2R with gain and F/B, such as with the C31XR. Ryan, N2RJ -- Ryan A. Jairam, _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00085.html (9,944 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:19:33 -0500
So a quad even if it's only a two element spider like quad will not qualify. I actually don't know how to fix this.,, Maybe go by the amount of gain? i dunno, Joe WB9SBD The Original Rolling Ball Clo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00090.html (8,942 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 16:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Yes, the rule wording for the low-band antennas is not clear. As written "...and single-element antennas on 40, 80, and 160 meters", it is not clear if that means ONE antenna for each of 40/80/160, o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00092.html (8,745 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "David J. Sourdis - HK1A" <hk1kxa@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 07:34:22 -0500
First time I read about the TB-Wire Overlay came to my mind the typical little station with a three element tribander (TH3, TA33, etc) with a couple of inverted vees sharing a common feedpoint. I bel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00097.html (13,394 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 01:36:52 -0800
Yes, you are correct. The goal of the overlay category is to provide a competition for a very "common" class of station. As we can see from the reflector messages there are always people looking to s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00211.html (11,790 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:46:01 -0800
I wasn't involved in the original drafting of this rule, but I suspect the purpose was to impose some limitations on the number of tribanders in use (one feedline = one antenna). It has also provided
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00271.html (10,165 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu