Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+The\s+K3\s+and\s+key\s+clicks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+The\s+K3\s+and\s+key\s+clicks\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] The K3 and key clicks (score: 1): Author: Dave Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:05:58 -0500 (GMT-05:00); This is the second discussion of key clicks on the cq-contest reflector and again Elecraft is being supported as the only transceiver clean enough to be entered in contests. I find it hard to believe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00250.html (7,712 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] The K3 and key clicks (score: 1): Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 07:42:20 +0300; Dave, not correct... Elecraft might be best in class, but there are many others that fulfill criteria for being a clean rig. Just to mention one, the TS 590 S (and most likely the newer model SG) are; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00260.html (9,167 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] The K3 and key clicks (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:33:07 -0800; Just to mention one, the TS 590 S (and most likely the newer model SG) are excellent CW-rigs without any tendency of clicking. Apparently you did not bother to read TXNoise.pdf In it, I observed that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00275.html (8,649 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] The K3 and key clicks (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:44:26 +0500; Hi Mats, TS 590 is indeed a nice contest radio. But unfortunately operator can change (intentionally or unintentionally) setting in the menu to make it clicking on CW. That cannot happen with K3. CW; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00280.html (11,122 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]