Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+The\s+King\s+\(Packet\s+cluster\s+network\)\s+is\s+dead\!\s+Long\s+live\s+the\s+Kin\.\.\.\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] The King (Packet cluster network) is dead! Long live the Kin... (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:29:45 EDT
Jose, Thanks for the FB data search and the interesting opinions. I would like to elaborate on one of your listed reasons, and to add another, for the big increase in qsos over the years. First, comp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00494.html (10,631 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] The King (Packet cluster network) is dead! Long live the Kin... (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:28:19 -0500
(Agreed, about Jose's research) I wonder, to what degree do the "big guns" believe SO2R has impacted scores? In the 1970s and early 1980s, one of the critical strategic decisions you had to make duri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00498.html (8,420 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] The King (Packet cluster network) is dead! Long live the Kin... (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Better receivers... Better understanding/appreciation of propagation to maximize openings. Consider that records have been decimated in the past few years with out the benefit of any significant acti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00501.html (15,086 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] The King (Packet cluster network) is dead! Long live the Kin... (score: 1)
Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Easy: current hardware has the capability to do in-band SO2R at any power level without the need for far-remote rx antennas, super filters, etc. All that is needed is a wide-band SDR hooked to the I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00510.html (9,576 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] The King (Packet cluster network) is dead! Long live the Kin... (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:42:22 -0400
A K3 with the separate subreceiver and N1MM Logger will come pretty close to doing this now. You send a CQ, listen on both receivers for the receive interval, and if you hear anything on the subrx, y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00513.html (11,208 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu