Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+The\s+New\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+Contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+The\s+New\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+Contest\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] The New ARRL DX Contest (score: 1): Author: ve6tn <ve6tn@shaw.ca>; Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:26:50 -0600; It would appear that individuals-of-influence are now seriously considering making changes to the way ARRL DX contests are scored. The ARRL DX contest of the future will no longer have a single ARRL; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00168.html (11,480 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] The New ARRL DX Contest (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:36:10 -0000; QUACK's The suggestion that the contest can't be changed is not really a serious one I would hope, Everything thing changes. A few years back the ARRL DX contest was a 2 weekend afair . I can rember; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00178.html (13,881 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] The New ARRL DX Contest (score: 1): Author: W0uo@cs.com; Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:09:22 -0400; As long as we are human, we will compete. The claim by any operator/station that he has won the contest. implying that that was done solely on the basis the he operated the best station and/or was th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00200.html (11,781 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] The New ARRL DX Contest (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:36:36 -0700; Actually, max power output for VE is 2250W PEP on SSB and 750W carrier power for any other type of emission (e.g. CW, RTTY etc). In terms of DC input to the final, it's 1,000W. Oh, and it's against t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00249.html (8,415 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]