- 1. [CQ-Contest] The mess I stirred up! (score: 1)
- Author: Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 05:24:36 -0500
- Rather than filling my Inbox with CQ-Contest e-mail, I read the archives on-line. Hence, my responses always lag. VE4XT had Cc'ed me on his reply to "Enough of this nonsense!!", and I heard at last n
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00118.html (8,575 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] The mess I stirred up! (score: 1)
- Author: Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:29:44 +0200
- As also somewhat pointed out by a few - being silent or transmitting has nothing to do with being the owner of the frequency! I can also use the frequency for receiveing only (say split operation), i
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00126.html (9,943 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] The mess I stirred up! (score: 1)
- Author: Geoffrey Way <wayg@cape-vision.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:54:49 -0500
- I would put things in this context: A running station "occupies" the frequency, and "holds" on to its use until one of two things occurs-- They "default" from it by failing to safeuguard against its
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00148.html (11,034 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu