Bill et. al. : I think that there is little chance that anyone can remove our personal opportunity to do the things you write of in your second paragraph below. The only thing that they can do is ham
K0TO: opportunity to do the things you write of in your second paragraph below. The only thing that they can do is hamper your ability to compare your results with others who choose to operate in the
Bill, You are correct. If skimmer is allowed for unassisted, then by simple extension, packet is allowed for unassisted as I see it. Doug I don't really like any of these alternatives. Maybe I'll jus
Bill: I am puzzled by why my suggestion about leaving the categories as is and simply identifying everyone who used some form of Skimmer seems so underwhelming to folks. If someone believes that Skim
Perhaps it's underwhelming because it doesn't address the primary issue...is Skimmer Unassisted or Assisted? If I entered Unassisted (sans Skimmer) but someone else who entered Unassisted (with Skimm
it would win almost every Section/Division in which a credible installation was used. (Credible=full time SDR second radio in use with a moderately skilled operator.) A non-user "radioman" who wishe
Tod; ? I am sort of in agreement with you here.? One thing that concerns me about this debate is that there seem to be an awful lot of people commenting and I wonder how many have actually used Skimm
Al, I haven't used Skimmer in a contest. I also haven't used a gill net (attached to the gunwale, extending no more than 499 meters from the centerline of the boat) in a Walleye Fishing Tournament y
Hi Al; I think you have a good idea about suggesting a one-year moratorium on the decision of whether or not to class 'local' Skimmer use as 'unassisted'. Although it will leave the issue open for a
and just what would be 'good evidence'?? increased score? So2r increases scores, yet this is allowed in unassisted. Automatic rotor control, cw keyers, supercheck, computer logging, etc. let the use