Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Thoughts\s+on\s+the\s+756PRO\s+for\s+contests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Thoughts\s+on\s+the\s+756PRO\s+for\s+contests\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on the 756PRO for contests (score: 1): Author: k0wa@swbell.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Mar 9 17:13:47 2001; My local contest buddies and I are in a debate on the "contestability" of the IC756PRO. I wonder if anyone out there is using the IC756PRO on both CW and SSB contests. I've read the reviews at www.eh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00154.html (6,992 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on the 756PRO for contests (score: 1): Author: jjarvis@keithley.com (jljarvis); Date: Sat Mar 10 11:20:31 2001; I've had a PRO for a year now. Dumped my 781 when I got it. It remains a good decision. The DSP filters are just fine. There is only one flaw in the rig...and it may or may not affect your perception; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00162.html (10,109 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]