Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Times\s+to\s+check\s+the\s+bands\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Times\s+to\s+check\s+the\s+bands\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Times to check the bands (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:19:35 -0800; I love it. I have always though in the VHF contests that we should do something similar - like 2 meters at 14 past, 222 at 22 past, and 432 at 43 past... Six meters at 50 past. Tree _________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00108.html (6,971 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Times to check the bands (score: 1): Author: "Harry Brown" <harryhbrown@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:49:47 -0500; On the east coast, a lot of VHF/Microwave stations use a "Contest Clock" that is widely distributed and has been in use for 30+ years for the major VHF/UHF contests. The "clock" is a circular diagram; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00114.html (8,323 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Times to check the bands (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:42:41 EST; Where might one find a copy of this "clock"? 73 - Jim K8MR In a message dated 1/8/2007 11:15:57 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, harryhbrown@earthlink.net writes: On the east coast, a lot of VHF/Microwave; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00117.html (7,298 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Times to check the bands (score: 1): Author: "Charles W. Shaw" <chasshaw@leaco.net>; Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:06:02 +0000; I do too. When shall we check 160 meters -- 30 past? What did the rules used to suggest? Chas - N5UL Hobbs, NM _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00119.html (7,589 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Times to check the bands (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:17:42 -0800 (PST); I love it. I have always though in the VHF contests that we should do something similar - like 2 meters at 14 past, 222 at 22 past, and 432 at 43 past... Six meters at 50 past. -- There was a similar; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00127.html (8,686 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Times to check the bands (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:12:07 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- In my original post I didn't suggest any check time for 40 meters and lower frequencies because they are always open to somewhere, just a question of distance vs; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00157.html (7,957 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]