Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+To\s+Skim\s+Or\s+Not\s+To\s+Skim\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] To Skim Or Not To Skim... (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:16:38 -0800
I (K6VVA) had written: type stuff. Barry, W2UP, responded: Problem with flagging a field in the log is Cabrillo is a text file and easy to view and edit. If the log file is submitted as a binary, the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00176.html (8,091 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] To Skim Or Not To Skim... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:44:30 -0500
I gotta ask... How would using something that can read the data from a wide bandwidth constitute "assistance"? How does it work in the digital world of the waterfall? I can't do it (I can barely do o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00177.html (10,699 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] To Skim Or Not To Skim... (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:50:12 -0500
Rick, If you believe Skimmer is assistance in the same category as packet/spotting and feel it must be banned, it would be far better/easier/less "big brother" is for contest logging software to 1) i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00178.html (10,487 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu