- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] To Skim Or Not To Skim... (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:16:38 -0800
- I (K6VVA) had written: type stuff. Barry, W2UP, responded: Problem with flagging a field in the log is Cabrillo is a text file and easy to view and edit. If the log file is submitted as a binary, the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00176.html (8,091 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] To Skim Or Not To Skim... (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:44:30 -0500
- I gotta ask... How would using something that can read the data from a wide bandwidth constitute "assistance"? How does it work in the digital world of the waterfall? I can't do it (I can barely do o
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00177.html (10,699 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] To Skim Or Not To Skim... (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:50:12 -0500
- Rick, If you believe Skimmer is assistance in the same category as packet/spotting and feel it must be banned, it would be far better/easier/less "big brother" is for contest logging software to 1) i
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00178.html (10,487 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu