Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+USA\s+WRTC\s+2002\s+Team\s+Selections\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke)
Date: Mon May 14 09:25:57 2001
I hope when each contest club selects their list of candidates for the WRTC-2002 (the USA teams) that they consider some of the good operators who have not got the chance to participate in the past W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00147.html (8,929 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: v31jp@logical123.net (Joe Pontek)
Date: Tue May 15 00:39:24 2001
Sour grapes? If they are the best, they should go again, and again, until someone is better. Don't dummy this down like everyother venue in America! On the other hand, we are not selecting our team,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00153.html (8,648 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: k1my@qwest.net (Bruce Makas)
Date: Mon May 14 18:15:47 2001
Couldn't disagree more with you, Jeff. This is not a "touchy fealy" feel good event. It is a world championship contest. You enter to win and to win we enter the best competitors that we have. Period
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00154.html (9,917 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: robert.n.shapiro@att.net (Rob Shapiro - ND3A)
Date: Tue May 15 05:27:52 2001
Agreed Joe. As long as the selection criteria is fair and as complete and as thorough as possible, if you're the best, you should be so rewarded. I just hope the clubs make a real effort to nominate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00155.html (9,795 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue May 15 08:20:52 2001
Hi Jeff -- don't know if you kept the data, but it might be very instructive to compile a table showing which US ops placed where in each of the 3 runnings to date. Perhaps a single figure of merit c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00156.html (8,519 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Tue May 15 12:42:06 2001
I thought KQ2M put it very well on the WRTC2002 reflector: "I personally think that the WRTC committee should use their wildcard selection criteria for ALL the participants, ensuring that everyone me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00157.html (7,359 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Tue May 15 13:18:52 2001
Hi Bruce, I'll have to say that I respectfully disagree with your opinion on this one. I think this event is a great excuse to get together with contest friends from around the world. Based on what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00160.html (8,323 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@bellsouth.net (Ed)
Date: Tue May 15 17:40:00 2001
I was surprised to learn of this also. I see absolutely no reason that the OH gang should have this authority. But, the only way I see to change this is for the US to boycott the WRTC until contester
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00161.html (8,475 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker)
Date: Tue May 15 14:26:06 2001
<3.0.6.32.20010515072052.00977140@mail.abs.adelphia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.200105
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00163.html (9,795 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR)
Date: Tue May 15 13:08:59 2001
I think K3EST was quoted before announcing the USA team selection criteria for WRTC-1996 as predicting that "nobody is going to like whatever I come up with". It is pretty obvious to me that not ever
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00165.html (8,202 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver)
Date: Tue May 15 13:23:04 2001
Sounds like a volunteer to organize WRTC-2004 to me... Speaking as an organizer of or referee in all three WRTC events, I think the Finns should do whatever it is that they consider reasonable. Ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00166.html (9,795 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Tue May 15 16:52:10 2001
I agree 100%. Here I must disagree. We should not be selecting "our team" or "our representatives", we should be selecting the best contesters in the world. This is not a contest among nations or reg
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00167.html (9,431 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com)
Date: Tue May 15 17:26:50 2001
The actual competition is almost secondary to the gathering. In 40+ years of contesting, being a judge at WRTC-96 was one of my most memorable experiences in the hobby. I have permanent mental pictur
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00168.html (7,570 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Tue May 15 17:47:14 2001
Anyone who is looking for excuse to get together is free to travel to WRTC, no need to go through "agony" of selection process, many do that and help or serve as judges, operate HQ stations, etc. Tho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00170.html (9,503 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: bernie@dailydx.com (Bernie McClenny, W3UR)
Date: Tue May 15 22:02:02 2001
My hope is that the US will send their best contesters to win the 1-2-3! I think Dave Bell's, W6AQ, video title of WRTC 2000 says it best "THE HAM RADIO OLYMPICS". In the Olympics we send our best pa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00171.html (8,259 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: coopersg@odl.co.uk (Stewart Cooper)
Date: Wed May 16 10:44:34 2001
I think it's probably fair to assume that your hopes will be realised. But it's the individuals (OK, teams) who will be the winners, not the country. Does anyone know... Is the WRTC 2000 video avail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00173.html (9,073 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections (score: 1)
Author: tombaugh@discoverynet.com (tombaugh)
Date: Tue May 15 14:55:17 2001
Interesting link>> Seems like we got some beleiving it's the good ole boys club, some believing the system is flawed and needs to be fixed and some believing we should be able to set our own adjenda
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00175.html (9,942 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu