Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Unlicensed\s+Remote\-Control\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Unlicensed\s+Remote\-Control\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Unlicensed Remote-Control. (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:22:15 -0800; In the 3830 reports for 31st January, there is a report from a US contester, who operated, by internet remote control, in the REF and CQ160 contests. It appears that both these operations were illega; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00004.html (7,327 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Unlicensed Remote-Control. (score: 1): Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>; Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:09:54 +0100; Looking at the comments he was just testing some stations. Not a big deal. Only problem was that he used his own callsign with the country prefix of the remote controlled station. If remote operation; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00007.html (9,554 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Unlicensed Remote-Control. (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:03:42 +0000; As PA5KT noted, the chap operating remote in EU from USA, like his other remote contesting efforts, is not so much of a big deal as from what I can tell he does not submit entries & if he did, they p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00026.html (9,047 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]