Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Use\s+cut\s+numbers\s+judiciously\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Use\s+cut\s+numbers\s+judiciously\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Use cut numbers judiciously (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:54:50 -0700; "OPERATING TIP Don't go nuts with cut numbers and other time savers if they aren't likely to be expected by the receiving station. Abbreviations only work if everybody expects and understands them. S; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00288.html (7,362 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use cut numbers judiciously (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:44:48 -0600; In CQ 160 from EI/W5GN, I heard a pileup on a VT station, when I needed that multiplier, but he worked 3 or 4 stations before I finally heard his call clearly. It was cut numbers for zone 40 from a T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00293.html (6,835 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use cut numbers judiciously (score: 1): Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:58:41 -0500; And "V" is not an acceptable cut number for "4" anyway. 4 like 6 has no acceptable cut number. The worst one I have encountered is often found by primarily European stations who send "J" instead of "; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00294.html (8,207 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use cut numbers judiciously (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:44:58 -0800; Personally, I don't think cut numbers should be used in any portion of the exchange that is vital. Apparently the RST is no longer something that need to be accurate so using 5nn or enn is fine with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00306.html (9,783 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]