Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+W1AW\/5\s+in\s+SS\.\s+\"everyone\s+was\s+affected\s+the\s+same\s+way\,\s+so\s+no\s+problem\"\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+W1AW\/5\s+in\s+SS\.\s+\"everyone\s+was\s+affected\s+the\s+same\s+way\,\s+so\s+no\s+problem\"\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] W1AW/5 in SS. "everyone was affected the same way, so no problem". (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 11:52:28 +0000 (GMT); This is a pitiful comment, ostensibly made by the ARRL "contact person." This shows complete disregard for their customers and also shows that they don't care about it. ARRL made a big deal out of it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00200.html (7,363 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] W1AW/5 in SS. "everyone was affected the same way, so no problem". (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:57:32 -0600; Doug, As you say "ostensibly". I was the author of the Phone SS writeups in QST and on the web. While I don't do the log checking, nor do I set ARRL policy, I do feel responsibility for "getting it r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00201.html (9,392 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]