Author: K3TN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:28:29 +0000 (UTC)
While I'm in favor of keeping with the gentleman's agreement of no contesting on the WARC bands, I'm not too worried about the VT QSO party allowing FT8 on WARC bands during its QSO party being the s
Author: K3TN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 17:21:41 +0000 (UTC)
I was kind of looking forward to seeing video of N6MJ doing SO8R while updating his Instagram page on his cellphone... 73 John K3TN I think an even bigger factor in the contest community not favoring
Author: Jim via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:59:11 -0500
I think an even bigger factor in the contest community not favoring contesting on the WARC bands was (and is) the desire to avoid the need for three more bands of competitive antennas. 73 - Jim K8MR
GM John Vt. is a minor Qso party........... It only takes a pin prick to empty out the pool. 73 BoB WA1FCN On 2/6/2020 4:28 AM, K3TN via CQ-Contest wrote: While I'm in
John's last point is the key, for me - an effective no-brainer counter to the anti-contester squall about our "hogging" the bands. Let's not spoil a good thing. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse B
The issue with 5BDXCC really doesnt have to do with WARC bands. It has to do with the challenge factor. Getting DXCC on 80 meters is considerably more difficult than getting it on other bands, with 1