Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WARC\s+band\s+contest\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WARC band contest (score: 1)
Author: Tack Kumagai <je1cka@chofu.jaxa.jp>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:21:04 +0900 (JST)
Does anyone know the exact reason why WARC band contest have been prohibited or not planned. I once read (not sure) the report that IARU adviced not to sponsor the contests on any WARC bands to the m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00070.html (7,211 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC band contest (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:35:50 -0500
As I recall, at the time the WARC bands were announced (or shortly thereafter) the IARU and other amateur radio organizations strongly suggested in effect that no existing contests add the new bands
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00074.html (9,649 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC band contest (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:07:38 -0800
I think that there are a couple of reasons why there hasn't been a push for including the WARC bands in contests. Most station owners who have invested lots of $$$ aren't intereted in having to add t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00077.html (7,598 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC band contest (score: 1)
Author: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa@latt.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:46:10 +0000
Tack, My anecdotal understanding is that the WARC bands aren't used for a few reasons: First, that 30m is shared with services in other ITU regions and we have a duty to avoid interfering with them.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00080.html (8,752 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC band contest (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:39:47 -0500
I fully agree with Tree. The WARC band issue is a third rail and we are well advised to leave it as is... 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00081.html (9,292 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC band contest (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 00:17:19 +0100
Only if they run split ;-)) Who needs more then 2kHz in a phone contest? 73 Peter On 17, the split is 42/58 khz data/phone, and on 12 it's 40/60. A dozen or so phone contesters can fill the entire ba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00083.html (8,128 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC band contest (score: 1)
Author: somata90924@mypacks.net
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 21:11:30 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
agree, lets leave the ''WARC contest free''! zf2ah Joe --Original Message-- Joe Hypnarowski _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00085.html (9,433 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC band contest (score: 1)
Author: Jacques Saget <f6bee@free.fr>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:43:03 +0100
This announcement on the Eu (World ?) cluster a couple of minutes ago this Saturday afternoon : To ALL de INXXX: Every weekend a different contest? You can not always occupy the frequency with the co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00086.html (8,088 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu