Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\-\s+EU\s+qso\s+party\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX- EU qso party? (score: 1)
Author: robert@gi0kow.freeserve.co.uk (Robert Cummings)
Date: Wed Mar 3 02:05:50 1999
Hi Group, I read Mike NO6X posting tonight regarding his experiences operating from Macedonia last year in WPX ssb. I note his comment "wanna talk about a qso party???" His comment set me thinking so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00019.html (8,029 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] WPX- EU qso party? (score: 1)
Author: Chad_Kurszewski@css.mot.com (Chad Kurszewski)
Date: Wed Mar 3 10:04:22 1999
True enough Robert, but you might be missing the point. You could roughly say that (rounding up) 50% of your QSOs were US and 50% were EU. Of those 50% EU, how many were 0 pointers (in your own count
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00021.html (8,793 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] WPX- EU qso party? (score: 1)
Author: k0hb@juno.com (Hans Brakob)
Date: Wed Mar 3 10:20:10 1999
I wish *I* could get 43.7% of my scorable contacts from my own continent like you did! Maybe this year I can, just like you've always been able to! 73, Hans, K0HB -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00022.html (7,569 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] WPX- EU qso party? (score: 1)
Author: robert@gi0kow.freeserve.co.uk (Robert Cummings)
Date: Wed Mar 3 18:58:22 1999
The only point of the post was to highlight the fact that WPX under the old rules was anything but an EU qso party which had been suggested earlier. I just thought it was interesting how close the ov
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00030.html (7,562 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu