Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+Spot\s+Analysis\s+$NT5C$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+Spot\s+Analysis\s+$NT5C$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX Spot Analysis (NT5C) (score: 1): Author: Jim George <n3bb@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 12:45:52 -0500; In the "For What It's Worth" department. NT5C was spotted 25 times during the 36 hours I was operating during the 2004 WPX CW contest. The spots data were taken from the OH2AQ cluster after the conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00071.html (8,617 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Spot Analysis (NT5C) (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 05 Jun 2004 18:33:48 -0500; For comparison, using a "not-WPX" call: W9WI was spotted ten times in somewhat less than 36 hours. I ended up with roughly 1,250 QSOs. (including dupes) The proportion was similar in my log. (conside; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00074.html (9,881 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]