Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+exchange\s+\-\s+4O3A\s+decision\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+exchange\s+\-\s+4O3A\s+decision\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision (score: 1): Author: "4O3A" <yt6a@cg.yu>; Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:07:52 +0200; Hi guys, After long and sometimes bothering discussion about this subject my final opinion and decision is : 1. 4O3A did not brake rules in any segments, at all. It is written that we have to exchang; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00120.html (9,601 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:57:01 -0600; Yeah...that's just your opinion, Ranko. Let no one reading this be confused that what you state is a fact, endorsed by the WPX CC. Your broadcasting has nothing to do with this. Go back and reread my; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00124.html (9,460 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision (score: 1): Author: "4O3A" <yt6a@cg.yu>; Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 19:03:33 +0200; Hi Steve, that's my opinion. Maybe, as am not English native, I said that a bit to artless. Maybe should say - it is not important and significant braking of rules and does not give any advantage or; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00127.html (10,961 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision (score: 1): Author: "Ernesto Martin Grueneberg" <ernesto.martin.grueneberg@googlemail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 08:18:39 +0200; Hey Ranko, are you serious? if the maximum allowed power is 1500W how come you think 1780W is OK? You are not serious, are you? Ernesto LU5CW PS: maybe you should tell us what other rules doesn´t rea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00130.html (12,269 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision (score: 1): Author: Dave/KA1NCN <dave@ka1n.cn>; Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 05:21:21 -0700 (PDT); So does ?QRP? now mean 100 watts? After all, it probably doesn?t give much of an advantage to an experienced operator with a superlative station?. Also (to combined multiple controversies into one),; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00138.html (8,052 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision (score: 1): Author: Chris Pedder <chris@g3vbl.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:26:32 +0000; Yep, Ranko tells us that what he did is the same as running 1780 watts when the limit is 1500 watts. Clearly 1780 watts merits disqualification and, with this in mind, doubtless Ranko will do the hon; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00139.html (8,865 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]