Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC\s+2018\s+\-\s+Area\s+Activity\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area activity (score: 1)
Author: Ranko Boca <yt6a@t-com.me>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 10:31:46 +0200
Hi Christian I saw area activity statistic on your WEB page-excellent! * http://www.wrtc2018.de/index.php/en/wettbewerb-2/standings-2?task=areaactivity ( It's self explanatory.This statistics can be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00141.html (7,559 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area activity (score: 1)
Author: 4O3A Ranko <yt6a@t-com.me>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:10:54 +0200
Hi Chris, I am commenting some parts of rules, with hope that organizer will think about it, even if dont change anything. -Yes, this is clear that we have to accept rules, if want to compete. -Yes,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00145.html (11,626 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area activity (score: 1)
Author: "Braco OE1EMS" <oe1ems@emssolutions.at>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:04:42 +0200
Chris and others Ist pretty simple Just take a look into statistic and you will see that according activity and avg points EU #5 is most difficult category in EU 908 Ops generating all most same numb
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00152.html (15,217 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area activity (score: 1)
Author: Zoli Pitman HA1AG via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:24:09 +0200
Chris, It is never too late. You can simply say, sorry we were wrong, we made the wrong assumptions and change the items Braco has mentioned for the rest of the qualification period. A good leader wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00153.html (15,362 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area activity (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:32:13 -0700
The choice of contests seems to be quite poor. From NorCal, I had roughly 90 minutes opening to Germany during WAG. K6XX, a superb operator with a great antenna farm on a mountaintop 70 miles S of Sa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00156.html (10,403 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area activity (score: 1)
Author: Filipe Lopes <ct1ilt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:55:14 +0200
Thumbs up! :) 73's Filipe Lopes CT1ILT - CR6K F4VPX - TM3M 2015-09-15 7:24 GMT+02:00 Zoli Pitman HA1AG via CQ-Contest < cq-contest@contesting.com>: _______________________________________________ CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00157.html (19,621 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area activity (score: 1)
Author: 4O3A <4o3a@t-com.me>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:17:33 +0200
Exactly. It is never too late. You can simply say, sorry we were wrong, we made the wrong assumptions and change the items Braco has mentioned for the rest of the qualification period. A good leader
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00159.html (16,569 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area Activity (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:16:20 -0400
If you have a small station you really don't have much a chance to qualify unless you have a friend who has a large station and allows you to operate. Another possibility is your friend qualifies and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00161.html (9,811 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area Activity (score: 1)
Author: 4O3A <4o3a@t-com.me>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:39:52 +0200
Yes Jeff, it's to late. Some of us have tried to point out the bad parts of the rules, even few times, unsuccessfully. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00162.html (8,265 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 01:42:24 +0500
If you have a small station you really don't have much a chance to qualify unless you have a friend who has >a large station and allows you to operate. Another possibility is your friend qualifies an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00163.html (9,770 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:08:27 -0300
That's a great idea! And a whole lot fairer for everyone. 73, Martin LU5DX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00164.html (9,636 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area activity (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:02:02 -0400
Well, he might still get his 1000 points towards WRTC-2018 qualification. Yuri VE3DZ The choice of contests seems to be quite poor. From NorCal, I had roughly 90 minutes opening to Germany during WAG
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00165.html (11,912 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Christian Janssen DL1MGB" <dl1mgb@wrtc2018.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:23:11 +0200 (CEST)
Hi guys, qualification rules are final and it is really not productive to complain. If you want to change the rules in the future, write to the Sanctioning Committee. Or apply for hosting the WRTC 20
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00167.html (8,838 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area Activity (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:22:33 -0700
Whatever committee made this mess needs to be told that they screwed up part of their job. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00170.html (8,965 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area Activity (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 19:23:07 -0400
Since the beginning, I was believing that the WRTC was comparable to a sort of Olympics. In that spirit, every nation can send only a limited number of players.Then even if there are many very good o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00184.html (10,187 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area Activity (score: 1)
Author: Maciek SQ6MS <sq6ms@o2.pl>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:55:04 +0200
Why you can`t compare classic Olympics to WRTC ? I do admire the top op`s for their operating and technical skills. And i do admire WRTC organisers for their effort to make rules equal for all parti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00189.html (11,377 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu