Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC\s+Selection\s+Criteria\s+\-\s+Was\s+WRTC\s+2006\s+\-\s+Where\s+areall\s+the\s+\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC\s+Selection\s+Criteria\s+\-\s+Was\s+WRTC\s+2006\s+\-\s+Where\s+areall\s+the\s+\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria - Was WRTC 2006 - Where areall the ... (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:01:53 EST; In a message dated 12/19/05 3:55:06 AM Greenwich Standard Time, w9wi@earthlink.net writes: Maybe an interesting way to select WRTC competitors... would be to somehow survey contesters... maybe with a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00391.html (7,827 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria - Was WRTC 2006 - Where areall the ... (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 19 Dec 2005 08:00:29 -0600; Well, what I'd envision would involve contesters worldwide having a vote on *every* eligible applicant -- so while your locals might be voting for you, you'd also have to pass muster in W1, and W6, a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00405.html (8,617 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]