Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC\s+Spotting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC\s+Spotting\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: "Carol Richards" <n2mm@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 09:23:03 -0500; I have received several comments related to my earlier post. I think Jeff, KU8E was right on track with his suggestion up to a point. I think it should be left to the WRTC committee to make the deter; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00164.html (8,639 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: mike l dol dormann <w7dra@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:29:30 -0700; cheer leading ?.................givecompetitorss their call at the start of the contest, with no way to give information on who they are to anyone, if anyone guesses who they are they get disqualifie; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00169.html (7,084 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:27:56 -0800; Actually I think the calls are issued just before the contest. But disqualifying them if someone guesses who they are seems mildly draconian. I'm no fan of dx-clusters, but the IOoDHW have elevated; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00170.html (8,837 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: "HK3CW" <cwdude@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:47:57 -0500; So who were R36F? Did they have an unfair advantage that showed in the final results? -- Original Message -- From: "Carol Richards" <n2mm@comcast.net> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, Ju; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00171.html (9,887 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:12:39 -0500; Can we say Cubs? Joe WB9SBD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00173.html (8,238 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:59:52 -0700 (PDT); Is there a list of the calls and operators available now? I know one call so far, didn't work 'em unfortunately... Julius Fazekas N2WN Tennessee Contest Group http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html http:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00177.html (11,576 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: Ron NŲAT <n0at@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:31:29 -0500; Why not let them spot themselves? 73 de Ron NŲAT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00182.html (7,701 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: Drew Vonada-Smith <drew@whisperingwoods.org>; Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 16:18:50 +0000; Rich and Group, I think Ed's point is pretty straightforward. He acknowledges that the two groups aren't competing against each other, that is not his point. His point is that such spotting will have; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-06/msg00078.html (8,033 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 19:06:18 -0400; Seriously, don't you are being punked? Every IARU participant this year will have a much better chance to win in almost any category because a lot of the very top competitors will be in the WRTC from; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-06/msg00082.html (10,594 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: Drew Vonada-Smith <drew@whisperingwoods.org>; Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 16:27:52 +0000; No, I don't think we are being punked. I think Ed is being perfectly honest about his concerns. I generally agree with Dave's observations below. But I'd also say that a big impact on the contest in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-06/msg00085.html (16,056 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 21:18:15 +0000; Dave, In the immortal words repeated from Luke Skywalker - everything you just said in this post was wrong. Actually, very few of the top contesters operate single op seriously in IARU. The HQ statio; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-06/msg00086.html (9,755 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:13:55 -0600; I don't see much of an issue. CW spots are automatic with RBN and skimmer. Why not SSB spots? IARU could change their rules. Same for any other contest. Maybe this is how we get everyone to use; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-06/msg00087.html (7,826 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: kq2m@kq2m.com; Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2023 10:29:55 -0500; Scoreboards are informative and fun to watch, and this usefulness brings about my main objection to their use being allowed by the NON-Assisted ops; that watching a scoreboard provides valuable infor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00000.html (9,955 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2023 09:52:37 -0600; Everyone should be on be on the scoreboard so that people can watch. It is a competition. Would you watch the Indy 500 or other events if they did not have a scoreboard or leader board? Would you w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00001.html (10,828 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: kq2m@kq2m.com; Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2023 18:18:07 -0500; I don't operate in contests so that other people can watch me. It's fine if they want to watch or listen to me, but it doesn't motivate me. I operate because I enjoy it and because it's fun. I do wat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00002.html (14,641 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2023 19:50:03 -0400; Wait. Are you saying that use of the scoreboard should be MANDATORY for all Operators? 73, Ron W3WN _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00003.html (12,549 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2023 21:46:18 -0300; Great post Bob. I read your previous and was NOT going to post, but your follow up post on scoreboards was so good that there is no way I could do a better job of it but felt compelled to add one tid; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00004.html (10,707 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 03:10:45 +0000; Scoreboards provide one very real value to operators - the opportunity to know how their competition is doing for score. Contesting used to be 'man isolated in basement' vs his own mental fortitude t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00005.html (12,426 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: kq2m@kq2m.com; Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2023 08:42:06 -0500; Scoreboards provide a multitude of information and different ops use that info in different ways to different effects. The score at any given point basically tells you who is ahead or behind in aggre; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00008.html (17,135 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1): Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>; Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 13:36:49 -0500; On 7/2/2023 8:42 AM, kq2m@kq2m.com wrote: Scoreboards provide a multitude of information and different ops use that info in different ways to different effects. The score at any given point basicall; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00012.html (9,172 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]