Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC2018\s+Qualifying\s*$/: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "Fco. Luis Delgadillo" <xe2b@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:09:22 -0600
Martin I totally agree with you on the selection criteria issue. The one for NA # 9 is totally biased towards the people who activate islands on zone 8. The differences are even worst for NA# 9 : Com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00034.html (31,879 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:48:23 -0500
I agree with Randy on this one. For years I looked at the assisted category as a lesser one. One day I tried it, and was hooked. Randy, K3WW and others would probably agree with me that it is harder
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00036.html (11,403 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 22:15:42 +0000
It could be worse. You could be in North Dakota. 73 Steve K0SR --Original Message-- From: Fco. Luis Delgadillo [mailto:xe2b@outlook.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 04:09 PM To: 'Martin , LU5DX',
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00037.html (28,562 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 15:03:37 -0800 (PST)
Randy is right.  Absolutely right My "point and click" remark was not appropriate and unfairly characterizes assisted class operations as the child of some lesser God. I am wrong for letting my pass
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00038.html (14,931 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: 4O3A <4o3a@t-com.me>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 00:23:07 +0100
Hi to all, I hope that some comments will be considered and Team selection criteria will be changed a bit? For me and all contesters whom I discussed with, obvious problem is having to short selectio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00041.html (11,660 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:57:37 -0500
Uh, clicking skills? If that is all there was to it any lid would make the top 10 in SOA. SOA involves running as well as trying to be nimble enough to jump to a different band to pickup a mult and n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00043.html (9,014 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Hal Offutt <hal@japancorporateresearch.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:02:53 +0900
Yes, but the question is who is disparaging whom? When the non-assisted category is eliminated, those who prefer to operate in that fashion are being told that their preference is no longer important
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00045.html (12,658 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:25:07 -0500
IMHO the Germans have come up with pretty good qualifying criteria. I do have two suggestions for our German friends: 1. For W/VE stations, the ARRL DX contests should count for a full 1000 points.Ov
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00047.html (12,564 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:43:31 -0500
If I understand K5ZD's statement regarding the WRTC2018 "Assisted scores are compared against Unassisted" both categories are grouped together. I have operated Assisted and Unassisted and I can see t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00049.html (10,243 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 00:16:11 -0300
I agree with you Ranko to some extent. I like the two-year format. However, due to time restrictions and traveling imposed by my job I am not sure I will be able to devote to the process as much I'd
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00052.html (12,475 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 23:34:05 -0500
Here's a thought: the WRTC2018 organizers might voluntarily follow procedures similar to those implemented by K5ZD for changes to the CQWW rules, that is, publish the rules as drafted by the committe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00055.html (12,765 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Andy Melanin <ua3dpx@mail.ru>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 08:48:35 +0300
If it's not too late, I agree with Ranko!! We really very busy not only with radio, but other life. 73! Andy UA3DPX P.S. Radio is main thing off cause !! iPad ________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00058.html (12,447 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "Braco OE1EMS" <oe1ems@emssolutions.at>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 15:10:37 +0100
I agree with Ranko 2 years/12 Contest sounds mad ...... some of us are crazy (incl. me) but I would like to do something else in next 2 years except contesting If I look to 2014 WRTC qualifications f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00060.html (13,003 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Tiberiu Tebeica <tebeica@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 17:45:06 +0200
Braco, I am glad you raised the ball regarding the number of qualifying spots for Balkan region. I will repost here my email sent to WRTC2018 mailing list, since it seems it was not approved by the m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00062.html (15,613 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Zoli Pitman HA1AG <ha1ag@hg6n.hu>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 16:47:43 +0100
Ranko and Braco got it right. I see no point why so many qualification events have to be squeezed in two years. Nowadays results are out fast. RDXC, WPX results of 2017 would be in time for qualifica
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00063.html (12,053 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Luca NCJ <ik2ncj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 18:09:51 +0100
There are different anomalies in WRTC2018 rules and many of them has been pointed out by many of us. In one mail to WRTC2018 reflector I wrote about anomaly in having Italy vs CT CU and EA (completel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00066.html (15,608 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Davor Kucelin via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 08:02:23 +0000 (UTC)
Hi guys, I agree totaly with Ranko, Braco, Tibi, Zoli and others,12 scores in two years is way too much even for us crazy contesters. EU#5 with only 3 qualifying spots is really not enough, especiall
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00080.html (8,798 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Richardson" <Ed_richardson@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:58:06 -0600
There have been a lot of posts concerning these changes and it looks like I am in the minority, but I like the changes. First, the ultimate goal remains unchanged. Operate in the designated contests
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00136.html (11,502 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:20:25 +0500
I think the best way to select deserving for WRTC would be to have one or two WRTC like competitions (virtually with the same rules as WRTC) in each selection area. That would allow those ops who is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00140.html (13,193 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:07:18 +0300
Reasonable and well balanced comments in general Ed. However, I tend to question the second part regarding "Learn to use the cluster and effectively manage the balance between running for rate and ch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00141.html (15,542 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu