Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC2022\s+Qualification\s+standings\s+update\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update (score: 1)
Author: Claudio Veroli <claudio.veroli@alice.it>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:40:19 +0100 (CET)
An important update to the qualification standings is available. It includes: CQWW CW 2019 Claimed scores added CQWW SSB 2019 Claimed scores added. RUSSIAN DX CONTEST 2019 Final scores added IARU HF
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00258.html (6,920 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:26:35 -0600
I just love this WRTC Competition. Well at least the part where they all use almost the same modest stations part. And that's just it. (I'm puttying my Flame retardant suit on now)  I would like to s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00261.html (9,450 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:57:27 -0500
Joe,You don't have to have a big station to compete.  If you do low power you will only compete against other low power stations. Bryant, KG5HVO is in first place in my region NA5. He has done a bunc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00265.html (10,043 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 23:21:01 -0500
The problem I have is that W2 competes with all of W1, including Maine. You can't beat Maine. The difference is significant even though both are East coast. When they had it in the US, it went by US
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00266.html (11,597 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 05:09:16 -0500
I would suggest that anyone who really wants to go to WRTC this round put a good effort in. What was before very unlikely for most of us is changing. If you take a look at the competition, or should
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00269.html (12,632 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:32:45 -0500
Also remember you can be picked as a teammate . The rules this time say you need to be in the top ten in your home region to be picked. This narrows the field compared to previous WRTC's. For example
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00271.html (13,034 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:39:12 -0500
Ironically, no one using a remote in Maine looks to be currently going to WRTC 2020 based on the current standings. So while technically that argument sounds plausible, the reality is different. Ed N
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00272.html (12,996 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update (score: 1)
Author: James Cain <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 16:10:01 +0000
Some rich capitalist should set up a remote-capable station at Italy WRTC 2022 and sell indulgences to operate. Italy is way too hot in July to actually spend 24 hours in a tent anyway. K1TN ________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00274.html (8,182 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update (score: 1)
Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 18:02:53 +0000
I imagine that the teams from NA5 and NA6 (and probably a few other qualifying areas) might find the experience refreshingly cool. -- Michael Adams | mda@n1en.org --Original Message-- Some rich capit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00276.html (8,886 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:08:43 -0400
I *wish* I lived in the USA or EU in order to be able to qualify this time. Ever see Canada on a map? Our huge country has 2 sections (East and West). Sure, I am near Maine, USA so positioned pretty
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00277.html (9,392 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update (score: 1)
Author: robert wa1fcn <wa1fcn@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:40:42 -0600
    GM Ria         Well you say "You can't beat Maine"  I do hope that is not completely true.         I have tried 3 years in a row to have top Low power Single Band 40 meter         USA score in WP
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00280.html (14,024 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings UPDATE (score: 1)
Author: Claudio Veroli <claudio.veroli@alice.it>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:15:14 +0100 (CET)
Hi all some comparison and qualification areas have been corrected. Most in North America.Some corrections in EU4 and EU8 WRTC areas, regarding some Russian operators, will be available soon. For any
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00296.html (8,904 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update (score: 1)
Author: robert wa1fcn <wa1fcn@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:00:34 -0600
GA Michael         Yes you are certainly correct about NA5. I was in #7 place,  now in 20th place.  I believe  I will         do better than that.  I am just trying to see if for the first time ever
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00204.html (7,496 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu