Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WW\s+CW\s+wrong\s+Zone\s+sent\?\s+PROVIDE\s+THE\s+VE2\s+CALL\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW CW wrong Zone sent? PROVIDE THE VE2 CALL (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Cassel " <paul@ve3sy.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 07:16:41 -0500
This whole thread would die if the original poster would simply provide the VE2 callsign. We could then confirm where that operation was located. Paul VE3SY __________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00600.html (10,612 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW CW wrong Zone sent? PROVIDE THE VE2 CALL (score: 1)
Author: <k8gt@mi.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:29:13 -0500
Oh, c'mon guys. Here some of us are ready to lynch a VE2 just because someone got bent out of shape because the sent zone didn't agree with the CTY file, which is the only "authority" anyone is using
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00608.html (10,343 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW CW wrong Zone sent? PROVIDE THE VE2 CALL (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:06:09 -0500
VE3SY said: "This whole thread would die if the original poster would simply provide the VE2 callsign. We could then confirm where that operation was located." Paul, as the originator (perpetrator?)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00612.html (8,551 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW CW wrong Zone sent? PROVIDE THE VE2 CALL (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:30:44 -0700
No attempt to lynch anyone from my end, and in fact I'm pretty sure the VE2 in question was actually located in zone 2 during the contest. My comments were in response to those of K0HB who couldn't u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00616.html (11,084 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu