Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Web\s+SDR\'s\s+and\s+\'Cheating\'\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Web SDR's and 'Cheating' (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 08:29:57 -0600
Forwarded from Topband. The beginning of the end. How do we stop this? --Original Message-- Hello Brendan, Perhaps this thread is too old, but I only now came across it, sorry if the subject has been
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00066.html (11,939 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Web SDR's and 'Cheating' (score: 1)
Author: Geoffrey Way <wayg@cape-vision.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:44:53 -0400
SDR's aren't a bad thing, we should just take care about how we make them available via the internet... How would it work if users were advised that what they are hearing is intentionally delayed by
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00071.html (7,323 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Web SDR's and 'Cheating' (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 11:53:55 -0700
What makes anyone think that cheating in this manner is limited to publicly available SDRs? I could set up a receiver/computer in Europe and stream the result over the internet to my QTH in the USA.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00079.html (8,592 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu