Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+What\'s\s+your\s+Opinion\s+on\s+2BSIQ\s+\?\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 00:24:19 -0400
I was wondering what everyone's thoughts are about 2BSIQ ? Do you think it's fair to group those who operate this way in with a traditional single-operator or should it (and SO2R) be a separate categ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00026.html (11,017 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: cosson-dimitri <cosson-dimitri@bbox.fr>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:50:52 +0200
Hi Jeff, I don't think that it should be a special category.They just work hard to do what the brain/the rule permits : one signal at a time. You can do it like those guys (or not ?).Imagine if I dri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00027.html (12,800 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 07:07:27 -0400
Jeff, There is a lot in this beyond 2BSIQ however I will just comment on that. The basis of all SO contesting is one signal on a band a time. Whether its working a mult on the second radio SO2R or wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00028.html (8,695 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 08:42:48 -0400
Jeff, I'm going to have to disagree with you. The fact of the matter is that the current rules fully allow 2BSIQ operating. The rules of most all contests for single operators state that only one tra
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00029.html (14,210 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 09:22:49 -0400
"The rules for ARRL contests prohibit dual CQing on the same band:" This is also true for CQ sponsored contests. It is general rule IX 7.: "Only one signal on a band is allowed at any time. When two
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00030.html (16,566 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 11:02:49 -0300
Hey Jeff, What's up? Bee in your bonnet or just fishing? hi I mostly agree with Ed and Dmitri's comments. In just 2 posts they pretty much covered it. How many ops in the shack? (One?, OK, single op
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00031.html (8,774 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:30:48 -0400
there over 75 feet. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00033.html (9,451 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 14:43:54 +0000 (UTC)
The ARRL rule is somewhat unclear -  Does the rule apply to multioperator stations? 2.1.2. Single-Operator stations are allowed only one transmitted signal at any given time; alternating CQs on two o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00034.html (9,816 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 11:59:40 -0300
And compare Nates excellent score to that of KC1XX with the big aluminum. Both ops 36hrs/SO2R I'd much rather go up against a single op running 2BSIQ and normal antennas in a normal QTH than an avera
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00035.html (9,172 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:42:36 -0400
Ria, You totally missed the point. I never proposed that the ARRL (or CQ) allow dual CQing on the SAME band. The fact is that this practice was allowed in the ARRL DX contest up until about 5 years a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00036.html (17,787 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:05:34 +0000 (UTC)
I since noticed that it does apply to multis. However, I thought it a bit odd that it was listed four times, once for each category, rather than as a basic rule for all. 73  -  Jim --Original Message
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00037.html (11,096 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: "tony.kaz--- via CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:16:12 -0400
Jeff, I agree with you. As an example when operating ARRL from the Caribbean and running on 15M SO1R unassisted, sometimes you have to make a decision to stop your run and see if 10M opened. But if I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00038.html (22,059 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:21:50 -0400
Jim, I know that in ARRL DX when doing a Multi-Single the run and multiplier station are both treated as being the same radio. You have to stop running and QSY to work a multiplier then go back to yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00039.html (13,357 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:28:52 -0400
Jeff, calm down. I was merely pointing out that this isnt *just* a rule from the big, bad ARRL. Rather, its common to both ARRL and CQ. Dont read more into it than there is. There is nothing else the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00040.html (22,283 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 22:13:56 +0200
Jeff, That is not dual cqing, it is interleaved operation on two bands. Only one signal can be transmitted at the time. And what about nice tribanders and high dipoles? I see not reason for a separat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00043.html (21,962 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:04:08 -0400
Finally a wise comment. Thanks, Peter. As I've always said: A "Motorist - Pedestrian" issue. 73, VE3DZ Jeff, That is not dual cqing, it is interleaved operation on two bands. Only one signal can be t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00046.html (21,717 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: Martin Pelt <n4uu73@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:09:53 -0400
I think 2BSIQ is no different Than SO2R. It is simply taking operator skill to a higher level. Martin N4UU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00047.html (24,378 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:12:55 +0300
My fifty Euro Cents: Having just returned home from OH0V, I am puzzled. I am not a gifted one. I found no way to synchronize a person answering my TEST OH0V on left radio by sending 'OH0V de HisCall'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00052.html (15,659 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 09:26:15 -0400
Dont come contests have overlays for these? Tri band wires Classic Rookie 73 Ria N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00053.html (24,318 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] What's your Opinion on 2BSIQ ? (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Stockton <aluminumtubing@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 08:12:01 -0500
Hi Jeff, 2BSIQ may currently be the only fair aspect of contesting. The development of that skill can occur anywhere so long as the individual has a computer, headphones, and the necessary desire to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00059.html (9,552 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu