Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+What\s+would\s+you\s+have\s+done\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:59:19 -0500
SS SSB. I worked an S&P station with a 2-land call who gave section WPA. No question he said WPA (unless I was halucinating), and it happens all the time -- many of you worked a 2-land station in New
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00331.html (8,515 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: Mike DeChristopher <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:41:45 -0500
Hi Art, If you email the WPA station, there's nothing he can do to fix it; he can't contact the other station and modify the logs after the contest. That wouldn't be very fair. You can email the log
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00338.html (8,341 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Brandon" <rb@austin.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:26:28 -0600
I'd let it ride. We all lose a few Qs for things beyond our control. Robert K5PI SS SSB. I worked an S&P station with a 2-land call who gave section WPA. No question he said WPA (unless I was halucin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00339.html (9,621 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:56:32 -0600 (CST)
Art, It sounds like you know who the two stations are and you have email addresses for them. If I'd overheard this, I'd email both stations and tell them exactly what you observed. And I would defini
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00340.html (10,149 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:24:33 -0500
I had 2 different stations in the 2nd half of Sunday start to send me a Field Day exchange before they caught themselves. I had a few more start with "59" and then they realized they didn't need to s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00343.html (9,901 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:53:34 -0500
Hi Ron, If you email both stations, and the stations use this information to correct their logs, they are making an exchange after the contest - and this is not legal. This is the same as emailing so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00345.html (11,487 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:35:04 -0600
"What happens in the contest, stays in the contest." Leave it alone. 3333333, Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00347.html (10,167 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:48:39 -0600 (CST)
I see your point. So one might want to wait to tell either or both of them until after logs had been submitted. That is a moral judgement that only the operators can, and should make. And frankly, if
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00348.html (12,978 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:22:38 -0600
I think we're overanalyzing the response here just a bit: if you notify the League as well as the other operators, the League is now in on the deal, so any post-contest edits would be immediately app
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00351.html (11,352 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:42:09 -0500
If one were to notify the league and they gave the "blessing", it would fly. But my suspicion is that Sean will say "log it and leave it" lest they create any frightening precedents. But we'll see, t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00353.html (12,555 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: doug smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:23:27 -0600
To play devil's advocate.. is it possible the correct exchange had been transmitted for both QSOs? i.e... is it possible he was mobile? Years ago, I sent seven different states during an ARRL DX SSB
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00354.html (8,431 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:18:12 -0500
Seems like I remember N6TR saying years ago on this reflector that his log-checking software is on the lookout for "unstable" exchanges, and will notice if either too many other logs have varying exc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00375.html (9,771 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu