Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+When\s+is\s+a\s+QSO\s+not\s+a\s+QSO\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+When\s+is\s+a\s+QSO\s+not\s+a\s+QSO\?\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:19:55 -0500; I certainly would not support having a computer compete in a contest on its own. However, does that invalidate the match between Kasparov and Big Blue? I don't think computer-controlled contesting an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00410.html (9,958 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:26:49 -0000; Yep, lively indeed. Not really. See below. See, it's part of the topic :) I have to disagree with you however. I'm not thrilled by the thought of working a robot station. As far as your question, th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00411.html (13,391 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1): Author: "Yuri VE3DZ" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:52:22 -0400; Why? Mostly because the level of cheaters would double, if not triple. Who's going to monitor / supervise all this stuff and HOW? I heard people now using remote RX's for pulling out weak DX signals.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00414.html (10,606 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 04:31:21 +0100; Interesting... How do they decode a conventional RTTY, SSB or CW transmission with a decoder only useful for decoding multitone FSK? Please explain! 73 Peter I know other people using WSJT in Contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00418.html (10,070 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:38:33 -0500; As I suspected when I first saw this topic appear, there is a lot more going on "out there" than most of us realize. We apparently have many contesters experimenting with computer controlled and/or r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00419.html (13,753 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 05:39:03 -0400; Kelly Taylor wrote: "There are much more important issues we could discuss. Personally, I, along with the great majority, I believe 97% was the figure I was quoted, of participants don't really give; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00423.html (10,633 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 26
Page: [1] [2]