Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Where\s+were\s+they\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Where\s+were\s+they\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Where were they? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:09:54 -0800; Curiously, did anyone hear (or work) VE1, VE4, VE5 or VE6 mults last night? I was stunned that I didn't hear a deluge of VE3's active. The overall participation seemed 'light' compared to past CW Spr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00089.html (6,793 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where were they? (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:04:38 -0700; Rick, I did not work a single VE. I heard a couple of VE3's. I missed IA, ND, SD, NE, MA, ME, RI, VT, AL, LA, MT, NV, UT, WA, WY I heard WY and probably WA. Very strange conditions really. 80 was lon; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00090.html (8,620 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where were they? (score: 1): Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:25:17 +0000; Rick, Imagine a contest where no one answers your CQ's and you get beat every time you call someone. Does that sound like fun? It's awful, and that also describes Sprint from up here. With the curren; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00092.html (9,715 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where were they? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:32:01 -0800; Hi Steve I agree. I think someone probably would have made 400 Q's if they had been allowed to use 160. I actually made 43 Q's on 20, but it was mostly short skip 6's and 7's. 73 Tom W7WHY __________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00112.html (7,881 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]