Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Where\s+will\s+NAQP\s+SSB\s+be\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Where will NAQP SSB be? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:28:34 -0800 (PST)
So - doing antenna work at K4JNY yesterday with Jeff, W4NZ and K0EJ included putting up another low dipole for 75/80m use. As were were tuning it, the question came up: Where is the NAQP SSB contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00110.html (7,306 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where will NAQP SSB be? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:05:50 -0500
This is a good question...not just for the NAQP, but for all SSB contests. It's particularly interesting for those of us who have narrow bandwidth antennas on 80/75, such as 4-squares and wire beams.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00112.html (8,919 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where will NAQP SSB be? (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:20:57 -0500
An interesting question - impacted by the breadth of the subbands allocated each license class. First, spots above 3.850 are congested with both pig farmers and nets. With an extra 150 KHz of room fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00113.html (9,582 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where will NAQP SSB be? (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:33:25 -0800
That sounds good to me - of course it might be a good idea to go where the general class and Advanced class guys can be worked too but it would seem to me that some high percentage of HF ops that are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00116.html (10,245 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where will NAQP SSB be? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:55:21 EST
Where is the NAQP SSB contest on 75m now going to be? ** I'd suggest that 3800 be the place to start, working up a little and down a lot from there. That way the anyone who has just acquired HF phone
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00118.html (7,876 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where will NAQP SSB be? (score: 1)
Author: <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:24:10 -0500
And the next logical question, will 3830 QSY lower in the band? :) Tor N4OGW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00120.html (8,053 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where will NAQP SSB be? (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:19:58 -0500
I hope stations in NAQP will continue to operate at least some above 3800, so the General class hams won't be left out entirely. Thanks for thinking of us. 73, John, K4BAI. __________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00121.html (8,948 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where will NAQP SSB be? (score: 1)
Author: Steve <murphys@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:39:23 -0500
This has worked well for me, too. 73, Steve N8NM _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00122.html (9,629 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu