Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+CQWW\s+scores\s+\"change\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+CQWW\s+scores\s+\"change\"\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Why CQWW scores "change" (score: 1): Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com); Date: Tue Nov 3 21:02:11 1998; << I wonder if anyone knows why scores still dropped after UBN Computer checking? For example OF1AF's score was after computer check (UBN file what was available via access code at http://cqww.com ); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00049.html (9,205 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Why CQWW scores "change" (score: 1): Author: n4kw@citrus.infi.net (Pete Raymond); Date: Wed Nov 4 10:13:17 1998; Doug Re the 1997 CQWWSSB My question is simple, when you do not lose any claimed multiplyers, your are docked 32Q's with a max of 3 points each (96 points) yet your calimed score is reduced by over 1; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00061.html (7,281 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Why CQWW scores "change" (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Wed Nov 4 17:53:55 1998; I think you're saying the W3BG qso would be deleted from the XX9XX log with penalty, correct? If so, what if XX9XX was running a pileup, answered and worked W3BG, but W3BGN *thought* he was the one b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00065.html (9,105 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Why CQWW scores "change" (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com); Date: Wed Nov 4 13:33:00 1998; This is a good argument for removing the QSO from both logs, in my opinion. That is why we went to this in the Internet Sprint. It puts responsbility for getting information exchanged correctly upon; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00073.html (8,615 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Why CQWW scores "change" (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Wed Nov 4 17:14:24 1998; I have to disagree with my buddy Lee on this one. There are very few instances of situations where the wrong guy gets penalized. I have found some of them in my reports/log too. I just figure everyo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00075.html (7,901 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Why CQWW scores "change" (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Wed Nov 4 23:37:04 1998; In this example, W3BG and XX9XX have correctly exchanged information...and have QSL cards to prove it. W3BG is a DXer, worked one Q for a new country and didn't send in his log. Why should XX9XX lose; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00077.html (8,972 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]