Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+did\s+the\s+Canadians\s+$PT5M$\s+beat\s+the\s+Americans$PW5C$\s+in\s+WRTC\s+2006\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+did\s+the\s+Canadians\s+$PT5M$\s+beat\s+the\s+Americans$PW5C$\s+in\s+WRTC\s+2006\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C) in WRTC 2006? (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:41:43 -0400; So, Jim, which 10 feet is this? From 50 to 60 feet? Or from 100 to 110 feet? Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00058.html (7,368 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C) in WRTC 2006? (score: 1): Author: "W3TX" <superberthaguy@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:55:12 -0400; They were simply the best operators comes to mind. Congratulations to them and all the participants! 73, Scott W3TX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00311.html (9,252 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C) in WRTC 2006? (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:47:58 -0700; Thanks Steve, I'll have to look at that article again. Thanks also for your reporting of your personal experience corroborating this. Confirms my belief that raising the antenna by 10 ft can make a n; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00306.html (26,843 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C) in WRTC 2006? (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:31:26 -0400; The original source for the "2 dB improvement" quote probably comes from QST, September 1966, "Station Design for DX" by W3AFM: "Incidentally, in progressive antenna changes at W3AFM, increments of o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00303.html (24,246 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C) in WRTC 2006? (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>; Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:49:38 -0700; Hi Jose, What an interesting analysis. Thanks for doing this Jose. I was particularly intrigued by your statement that a 2 db improvement in signal strength will provide access to another level of st; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00297.html (21,488 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C) in WRTC 2006? (score: 1): Author: k3bu@optonline.net; Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:22:51 -0400; Interesting analysis, just proves that there is luck factor involved in WRTCs. One is the call sign, PT5M has fewer dots and dashes than PW5C. Another one, as analyzed is the location. Another one im; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00295.html (8,471 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]