Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+did\s+the\s+Canadians\s+$PT5M$\s+beat\s+theAmericans$PW5C$in\s+WRTC\s+2006\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+did\s+the\s+Canadians\s+$PT5M$\s+beat\s+theAmericans$PW5C$in\s+WRTC\s+2006\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat theAmericans(PW5C)in WRTC 2006? (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:10:55 -0500; Very interesting analysis, Jose, and fairly persuasive. But I wonder if you can tell how much of that 40 meter period was S&P vs Run for the two stations? Was one spending most of their time trying t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00299.html (8,162 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat theAmericans(PW5C)in WRTC 2006? (score: 1): Author: Barry Middlebrook <ve6tn@shaw.ca>; Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:50:58 -0600; This is a very interesting thread. I would like to add that: a) When I look at the elevation comparison site http://ct1boh.planetaclix.pt/wrtc/pt5m_pw5c_terrain.JPG and I adjust the vertical scale to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00325.html (9,959 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]