Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+not\s+do\s+a\s+test\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+not\s+do\s+a\s+test\?\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Why not do a test?? (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 10:34:29 -0400; Scores are a product of many factors that are entirely the responsibility of the person controlling the operation. We want to take propagation out of the equation. The only way to do that is to deter; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00042.html (11,005 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why not do a test?? (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 13:08:01 -0800; Who is "we"? Do you have a mouse in your pocket? Figuring out propagation patterns and crafting a strategy to "tilt your field" to gain the favor of those patterns seems one of the skills which separ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00044.html (9,062 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why not do a test?? (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 15:32:32 -0400; Doesn't some of the data already exist? HFTA comes with elevation statistics files for the ten US call areas that contain arrival angles for seven popular paths averaged over at least one solar cycle; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00046.html (12,434 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why not do a test?? (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:59:13 -0500; There has been a beacon system in place for many years. http://www.ncdxf.org/beacon/earlyhistory.html It also adds the feature of variable power levels to help determine minimum power needed to overc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00050.html (13,336 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why not do a test?? (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 16:31:40 -0400; The existing transmitting beacons are useless unless they use standard antennas properly oriented at similar site types and they are in useful general locations in the USA. Reverse beacons with us us; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00052.html (15,108 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why not do a test?? (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 15:47:23 -0500; My understanding is that the NCDXF/IARU beacons were deployed with "standard" antennas, the Cushcraft R5 multi-band verticals. Granted, looking at some of the photos on the site, there have been some; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00054.html (16,697 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why not do a test?? (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 17:26:25 -0400; Hi Bob, I don't think it is a problem to use anything that exists if it is useful and does not take more time. Is that system really useful? Are the beacons on all bands? Are they in the right locati; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00057.html (18,632 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why not do a test?? (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:24:09 -0500; Hello Tom... I am not an RF engineer (haven't even been offered to play one on TV) so I don't have the technical background to determine whether the existing system is "good enough" to satisfy statis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00059.html (21,284 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]